← Capabilities
Capability Brief

Organised Crime & Illicit Economy Response

The capacity to fight networks rather than incidents: standing units, intelligence-led operations, asset recovery and the cross-border cooperation that organised crime forces on every state.

Indicators
3
Leaders
10placeholder ratings
Like it
8capabilities
Developments
18
Definition

What Organised Crime & Illicit Economy Response is, and how it is measured

The capacity to fight networks rather than incidents: standing units, intelligence-led operations, asset recovery and the cross-border cooperation that organised crime forces on every state.

Indicators

  • Organised crime resilience score
  • Criminality score
  • Asset recovery value
Leaders

The nations that lead in Organised Crime & Illicit Economy Response

Placeholder

These ratings stand in until the capability is rated.

#NationRating
1United StatesAAA
2JapanAA
3FranceAA
4SingaporeA
5ItalyA
6DenmarkA
7SwedenBBB
8IndiaBBB
9South KoreaBB
10AustraliaBB
Related

The capabilities most like Organised Crime & Illicit Economy Response

Likeness, from 0 to 1, as the Atlas measures it.

Developments

How Organised Crime & Illicit Economy Response came to be

  • Geopolitical
  • Governance
  • Security
  • Technology
  • Economy
  • Society

Historical Developments

Oldest first
  1. 1930s

    Labour racketeers entrenched labour racketeering in major industries

    From the 1930s labour racketeering developed to affect national and international construction, mining, energy production and transportation sectors. Its penetration of legitimate industry made economic-sector regulation and union oversight part of organised crime response.

  2. 1931

    US federal prosecutors secured an 11-year sentence on tax charges against a leading crime boss

    The conviction carried 11 years in federal prison plus $215,000 in back taxes and accrued interest. Using financial and tax law rather than violent-crime charges established a template for attacking criminal enterprises through their money.

  3. 1966

    Criminologist Spergel pioneered evidence-based practice in gang research

    Spergel was among the first criminologists to base analysis of gang life and culture on evidence rather than intuition. The shift towards empirical study underpinned later intelligence-led approaches to gang and network disruption.

  4. 1970

    United States Congress passed the Organized Crime Control Act, defining organised crime in law

    The Act defined organised crime as the unlawful activities of a highly organised, disciplined association, and established racketeering as a structured criminal process. Giving the phenomenon a statutory definition was a precondition for standing units and network-level prosecution rather than incident-by-incident policing.

  5. 1976

    The United Nations and the European Union moved towards international consensus on defining organised crime

    International consensus on a definition became important from the 1970s as organised crime's prevalence and cross-border impact grew, with the UN addressing it in 1976 and the EU following in 1998. Shared definitions underpin the cross-border cooperation that transnational criminal networks force on states.

  6. 1990s

    Organised crime groups from Russia, China, Italy, Nigeria and Japan expanded their transnational networks after the Cold War

    A 2012 US Department of Justice journal noted that since the end of the Cold War these groups had increased their international presence and involvement in transnational criminal activity, with most major international groups present in the United States. The dissolution of the Soviet Union and the 1989 revolutions in Eastern Europe created particularly fertile ground for criminal organisations.

  7. 1996–2000

    The Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering ran a sustained but failed effort to estimate global money laundering

    The FATF, an intergovernmental body set up to combat money laundering, later acknowledged that its sustained attempt between 1996 and 2000 to produce reliable estimates of laundering volumes failed. The episode exposed the measurement problem at the heart of illicit finance response.

  8. 1998

    The European Union adopted its own definition of organised crime

    Following the UN's work two decades earlier, the EU set out a definition of organised crime in 1998. Common definitional standards across member states enabled joint operations and mutual legal assistance against networks operating in multiple jurisdictions.

  9. 1998

    US courts convicted a trafficker of importing heroin into the United States

    Tse was convicted in 1998 of transporting heroin into the United States and served nine years in prison, having immigrated to Canada a decade earlier in 1988. The case illustrated the cross-border reach required to prosecute transnational drug networks.

Recent Developments

Most recent first
  1. 2030

    The United Nations set a target to combat all forms of organised crime under Sustainable Development Goal 16

    SDG 16 of the 2030 Agenda includes a target on combating organised crime, embedding the issue in global development governance. It linked criminal-network response to state institutional strength rather than treating it purely as a policing matter.

  2. 2017

    The US Drug Enforcement Administration named Mexican transnational criminal organisations the greatest criminal drug threat

    The DEA's National Drug Threat Assessment identified the Sinaloa, Jalisco New Generation, Juárez, Gulf, Los Zetas and Beltrán-Leyva cartels as the six most influential Mexican TCOs trafficking into the United States. The assessment shifted threat prioritisation towards cartel networks dominating cultivation, production and transport.

  3. July 2010

    Security experts discovered malicious software infiltrating factory computers worldwide

    In mid-July 2010 researchers found a malware program that had penetrated industrial plant computers and spread internationally. Its discovery marked the arrival of industrial-scale cyber intrusion as a dimension of illicit activity requiring new investigative capability.

  4. 2009

    The UN Office on Drugs and Crime estimated money laundering at 2.7% of global GDP

    A UNODC study placed money laundering at about 2.7 per cent of global GDP, roughly $1.6 trillion. The figure became a reference point for the scale of the illicit economy that financial-intelligence regimes were built to counter.

  5. 2007

    The OECD reported the widened scope of counterfeit products

    The OECD found counterfeiting extended well beyond films, music and fashion to food, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, electrical components, tobacco and household cleaning products. Documenting this breadth reframed counterfeiting as a public-safety and supply-chain enforcement problem.

  6. 2005

    The UN Office on Drugs and Crime estimated organised crime groups held $322 billion in assets

    The UNODC put the asset holdings of organised crime groups at $322 billion. Such estimates provided the quantitative basis for arguing that asset recovery, not arrests alone, was the decisive instrument against criminal enterprises.

  7. 2002–10

    US researchers recorded a 35% rise in youth street gangs

    Estimates compiled by Hannigan and colleagues marked a 35 per cent increase in US youth street gangs between 2002 and 2010. The growth drove renewed attention to gang suppression and prevention as part of organised crime response.

  8. 2001

    The IOM, FBI and UNICEF published wildly divergent human trafficking estimates

    In 2001 the International Organization for Migration estimated 400,000 victims, the FBI 700,000 and UNICEF 1.75 million. The spread of more than fourfold between official bodies revealed how weak the evidence base for trafficking enforcement remained.

  9. 2001

    Anti-money laundering authorities seized $386 million in laundered assets

    Asset recovery efforts in 2001 captured some $386 million of laundered money worldwide. Set against estimates of laundering flows in the trillions, the figure illustrated the limited reach of early asset-recovery capability.