← Capabilities
Capability Brief

Alliance & Treaty Networks

The capacity to hold binding commitments: mutual-defence treaties, alliance memberships in good standing, partnership agreements and the coalition leadership that turns a network into weight.

Indicators
3
Leaders
10placeholder ratings
Like it
5capabilities
Developments
14
Definition

What Alliance & Treaty Networks is, and how it is measured

The capacity to hold binding commitments: mutual-defence treaties, alliance memberships in good standing, partnership agreements and the coalition leadership that turns a network into weight.

Indicators

  • Mutual defence treaty allies
  • Strategic partnership agreements in force
  • Basing and access agreements
Leaders

The nations that lead in Alliance & Treaty Networks

Placeholder

These ratings stand in until the capability is rated.

#NationRating
1FranceAAA
2GermanyAA
3South KoreaAA
4DenmarkA
5SwedenA
6ItalyA
7SwitzerlandBBB
8FinlandBBB
9United StatesBB
10NetherlandsBB
Related

The capabilities most like Alliance & Treaty Networks

Likeness, from 0 to 1, as the Atlas measures it.

Developments

How Alliance & Treaty Networks came to be

  • Geopolitical

Historical Developments

Oldest first
  1. 1373

    Kingdoms of England and Portugal pledged perpetual friendship in the Anglo-Portuguese Alliance

    England and Portugal concluded a treaty binding the two crowns to perpetual friendship. It is cited as the oldest alliance still in force in the world today, demonstrating that treaty commitments can outlast the regimes that made them.

  2. 1668

    Great Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands formed the Triple Alliance against Louis XIV

    Three states combined in a balancing coalition directed against the power of Louis XIV of France. It exemplified the early modern pattern of alliances formed to check a dominant continental power.

  3. 1689

    The Holy Roman Empire, Holland, England, Spain and Saxony concluded the Grand Alliance against French power

    A five-party coalition was assembled to resist Louis XIV. The grouping showed how multilateral coalition-building could aggregate weight against a single hegemon.

  4. 1814

    Great Britain, Austria, Russia and Prussia signed the Treaty of Chaumont forming the Quadruple Alliance

    The four powers bound themselves to overthrow Napoleon and confine France within her traditional boundaries. The treaty established a durable great-power coalition framework that outlived the war it was made to win.

  5. 1815

    Emperor Alexander I of Russia inspired the Holy Alliance as a league of European governments

    Signed on 26 September 1815, the Holy Alliance sought a common basis for European governments in the sacred precepts of the Gospel, with the preservation of peace as its primary object. It represented an early attempt at an ideologically grounded, general-purpose league rather than a war-fighting pact.

  6. 1815

    The great powers signed the Quadruple Treaty at Paris, whose Article VI extended the Grand Alliance

    The treaty of 20 November 1815 renewed that of Chaumont and extended the scope of the Grand Alliance to objects of common interest not specifically stated. Article VI, rather than the Holy Alliance, became the legal basis for governing Europe in concert.

  7. 1815–22

    The great powers attempted to govern Europe in concert under the 1815 treaty

    Between 1815 and 1822 the signatories used Article VI of the November 1815 treaty as the basis for a sustained effort at concerted European governance. The treaty was renewed again at Aix-la-Chapelle in 1818, giving the congress system an institutional footing.

Recent Developments

Most recent first
  1. 1979

    Kenneth Waltz published Theory of International Politics

    Waltz set out a neorealist account in which balances of power tend to form in world politics. The work provided the dominant theoretical framework for explaining why states enter alliances.

  2. 1950s

    The United States Department of State distinguished alliances from collective security arrangements

    An early 1950s memorandum argued that historic alliances advanced the nationalistic interests of their parties and provided for joint military action, whereas a collective security arrangement is directed against aggression alone. The distinction underpinned the post-war architecture of multilateral security commitments.

  3. 1950

    The interstate alliance network became four times denser and more stable after 1950

    A network study by Jackson and Nei found the history of interstate alliances divides into a thin, unstable pre-1950 era and a far denser, more stable network thereafter. The shift reflects the consolidation of permanent peacetime alliance systems.

  4. 1945

    Military alliances shifted from aggression to deterrence after the Second World War

    Since the end of the Second World War alliances have generally behaved less aggressively and functioned chiefly as deterrents. The change marks a reorientation in the purpose of binding security commitments.

  5. 1890s

    Russia and France formed the Dual Alliance in response to the Triple Alliance

    About ten years after the Triple Alliance, Russia and France bound themselves to mutual support in case of hostile action by other powers. The pairing completed the division of Europe into opposing alliance blocs.

  6. 1882

    Germany, Austria and Italy concluded the Triple Alliance of 1882

    The three powers formed a pact ostensibly aimed at preserving European peace against aggressive action by France or Russia. It triggered a counter-balancing response and helped structure the bloc system of pre-war Europe.

  7. 1870–1916

    European states made almost all alliances covert or implied

    A 2019 study found that during peacetime in this period nearly all alliances were secret or merely implied, with the prevalence of covert pacts incentivising further secrecy. The episode marks a distinct phase in how binding commitments were held and signalled.