- Indicators
- 3
- Leaders
- 10placeholder ratings
- Like it
- 5capabilities
- Developments
- 14
What Alliance & Treaty Networks is, and how it is measured
The capacity to hold binding commitments: mutual-defence treaties, alliance memberships in good standing, partnership agreements and the coalition leadership that turns a network into weight.
Indicators
- Mutual defence treaty allies
- Strategic partnership agreements in force
- Basing and access agreements
The nations that lead in Alliance & Treaty Networks
These ratings stand in until the capability is rated.
| # | Nation | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | France | AAA |
| 2 | Germany | AA |
| 3 | South Korea | AA |
| 4 | Denmark | A |
| 5 | Sweden | A |
| 6 | Italy | A |
| 7 | Switzerland | BBB |
| 8 | Finland | BBB |
| 9 | United States | BB |
| 10 | Netherlands | BB |
The capabilities most like Alliance & Treaty Networks
Likeness, from 0 to 1, as the Atlas measures it.
How Alliance & Treaty Networks came to be
- Geopolitical
Historical Developments
Oldest first1373
Kingdoms of England and Portugal pledged perpetual friendship in the Anglo-Portuguese Alliance
England and Portugal concluded a treaty binding the two crowns to perpetual friendship. It is cited as the oldest alliance still in force in the world today, demonstrating that treaty commitments can outlast the regimes that made them.
1668
Great Britain, Sweden and the Netherlands formed the Triple Alliance against Louis XIV
Three states combined in a balancing coalition directed against the power of Louis XIV of France. It exemplified the early modern pattern of alliances formed to check a dominant continental power.
1689
The Holy Roman Empire, Holland, England, Spain and Saxony concluded the Grand Alliance against French power
A five-party coalition was assembled to resist Louis XIV. The grouping showed how multilateral coalition-building could aggregate weight against a single hegemon.
1814
Great Britain, Austria, Russia and Prussia signed the Treaty of Chaumont forming the Quadruple Alliance
The four powers bound themselves to overthrow Napoleon and confine France within her traditional boundaries. The treaty established a durable great-power coalition framework that outlived the war it was made to win.
1815
Emperor Alexander I of Russia inspired the Holy Alliance as a league of European governments
Signed on 26 September 1815, the Holy Alliance sought a common basis for European governments in the sacred precepts of the Gospel, with the preservation of peace as its primary object. It represented an early attempt at an ideologically grounded, general-purpose league rather than a war-fighting pact.
1815
The great powers signed the Quadruple Treaty at Paris, whose Article VI extended the Grand Alliance
The treaty of 20 November 1815 renewed that of Chaumont and extended the scope of the Grand Alliance to objects of common interest not specifically stated. Article VI, rather than the Holy Alliance, became the legal basis for governing Europe in concert.
1815–22
The great powers attempted to govern Europe in concert under the 1815 treaty
Between 1815 and 1822 the signatories used Article VI of the November 1815 treaty as the basis for a sustained effort at concerted European governance. The treaty was renewed again at Aix-la-Chapelle in 1818, giving the congress system an institutional footing.
Recent Developments
Most recent first1979
Kenneth Waltz published Theory of International Politics
Waltz set out a neorealist account in which balances of power tend to form in world politics. The work provided the dominant theoretical framework for explaining why states enter alliances.
1950s
The United States Department of State distinguished alliances from collective security arrangements
An early 1950s memorandum argued that historic alliances advanced the nationalistic interests of their parties and provided for joint military action, whereas a collective security arrangement is directed against aggression alone. The distinction underpinned the post-war architecture of multilateral security commitments.
1950
The interstate alliance network became four times denser and more stable after 1950
A network study by Jackson and Nei found the history of interstate alliances divides into a thin, unstable pre-1950 era and a far denser, more stable network thereafter. The shift reflects the consolidation of permanent peacetime alliance systems.
1945
Military alliances shifted from aggression to deterrence after the Second World War
Since the end of the Second World War alliances have generally behaved less aggressively and functioned chiefly as deterrents. The change marks a reorientation in the purpose of binding security commitments.
1890s
Russia and France formed the Dual Alliance in response to the Triple Alliance
About ten years after the Triple Alliance, Russia and France bound themselves to mutual support in case of hostile action by other powers. The pairing completed the division of Europe into opposing alliance blocs.
1882
Germany, Austria and Italy concluded the Triple Alliance of 1882
The three powers formed a pact ostensibly aimed at preserving European peace against aggressive action by France or Russia. It triggered a counter-balancing response and helped structure the bloc system of pre-war Europe.
1870–1916
European states made almost all alliances covert or implied
A 2019 study found that during peacetime in this period nearly all alliances were secret or merely implied, with the prevalence of covert pacts incentivising further secrecy. The episode marks a distinct phase in how binding commitments were held and signalled.