← Capabilities
Capability Brief

Talent Attraction & Retention

The capacity to attract skilled people from abroad, hold the skilled people already here and win the international contest for talent.

Indicators
3
Leaders
10placeholder ratings
Like it
5capabilities
Developments
6
Definition

What Talent Attraction & Retention is, and how it is measured

The capacity to attract skilled people from abroad, hold the skilled people already here and win the international contest for talent.

Indicators

  • International researcher and student inflow
  • Stay rate of international graduates
  • Net migration of tertiary-educated
Leaders

The nations that lead in Talent Attraction & Retention

Placeholder

These ratings stand in until the capability is rated.

#NationRating
1United KingdomAAA
2South KoreaAA
3FranceAA
4United StatesA
5SwedenA
6CanadaA
7ItalyBBB
8DenmarkBBB
9ChinaBB
10SwitzerlandBB
Related

The capabilities most like Talent Attraction & Retention

Likeness, from 0 to 1, as the Atlas measures it.

Developments

How Talent Attraction & Retention came to be

  • Governance
  • Economy

Historical Developments

Oldest first
  1. 1997

    Steven Hankin of McKinsey & Company coined the term "war for talent"

    Hankin's phrase named the increasingly competitive landscape for recruiting and retaining talented employees. It gave organisations and governments a shared vocabulary for treating talent as a contested, scarce resource rather than a routine personnel matter.

  2. 2001

    Ed Michaels, Helen Handfield-Jones and Beth Axelrod published The War for Talent with Harvard Business Press

    The book popularised the concept beyond consulting circles, arguing that competitive advantage rested not on superior human resources processes but on a mindset placing talent at the centre of organisational success. It became the standard reference for talent attraction and retention strategy.

  3. 2006

    The Economist noted companies did not even know how to define talent

    A 2006 article referencing the Michaels book observed that firms could not define talent, let alone manage it. The critique highlighted the conceptual weakness underlying talent attraction and retention practice.

Recent Developments

Most recent first
  1. 2019–21

    United States labour market tightened from 1.2 to 1.5 vacancies per unemployed person

    Vacancies per unemployed worker stood at 1.2 in the fourth quarter of 2019 and reached 1.5 two years later. The shift documented how post-pandemic conditions sharpened an already tight competition for skilled workers.

  2. 2016

    A digital business study identified inability to attract talent as a major digital threat to governments

    The 2016 study found that ministries' capacity to attract and retain talent was among the most serious and most overlooked digital threats governments faced. It framed public sector talent competition as a matter of state capability rather than mere administration.

  3. 2009

    Solvent firms engaged in visible talent poaching from distressed competitors

    During the economic downturn, financially sound firms raided employers under hardship, as when JP Morgan was raided by a European firm in March 2009. This showed that the contest for talent intensifies rather than abates in a recession.