- Indicators
- 3
- Leaders
- 10placeholder ratings
- Like it
- 7capabilities
- Developments
- 28
What Productivity Growth & Allocative Efficiency is, and how it is measured
The capacity to raise output per unit of everything: the reform machinery, standing productivity institutions and reallocation of resources toward their best use that compound into long-run growth.
Indicators
- Total factor productivity growth
- Labour productivity per hour worked
- Productivity gap to frontier
The nations that lead in Productivity Growth & Allocative Efficiency
These ratings stand in until the capability is rated.
| # | Nation | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | AAA |
| 2 | United Kingdom | AA |
| 3 | France | AA |
| 4 | United States | A |
| 5 | Denmark | A |
| 6 | Sweden | A |
| 7 | Canada | BBB |
| 8 | Italy | BBB |
| 9 | Finland | BB |
| 10 | Norway | BB |
The capabilities most like Productivity Growth & Allocative Efficiency
- Services Economy0.09
Likeness, from 0 to 1, as the Atlas measures it.
How Productivity Growth & Allocative Efficiency came to be
- Geopolitical
- Governance
- Technology
- Economy
Historical Developments
Oldest firstc. 8000 BCE · about 10,000 years ago
The Neolithic Agricultural Revolution created the first sustained output surplus
The domestication of crops and livestock allowed communities to produce more than they consumed for subsistence, creating the first durable surplus of output over input and the origin point of productivity as an economic idea.
8th century onward · about 1,300 years ago
The Arab Agricultural Revolution spread new crops and irrigation across the Islamic world
Diffusion of new crops, crop rotation and irrigation technologies including qanats and water-raising devices across the Islamic world from Spain to Central Asia sharply raised agricultural yields and supported urban growth.
11th century · about 1,000 years ago
Song dynasty China saw a burst of agricultural and craft productivity
Advances in rice cultivation, ironworking, printing and paper currency lowered transaction costs and raised output across farming and manufacture, producing one of the most sustained productivity expansions of the premodern world.
1911 · 115 years ago
Frederick Taylor codified scientific management in industry
The Principles of Scientific Management proposed systematic time-and-motion study to raise output per worker, founding a management science tradition that shaped twentieth-century industrial productivity practice worldwide.
1920s–30s · 106 years ago
Industry adopted tabulating machines for data processing on a wide scale
Tabulating machines came into widespread use for data processing during the interwar decades and remained in service until mainframes displaced them. They represented an early mechanisation of clerical and administrative work relevant to partial productivity measurement.
1940 · 86 years ago
National income accounting gave economies a common yardstick for output
Work by statisticians including Colin Clark, Richard Stone and Simon Kuznets built the national accounts frameworks that made systematic, comparable measurement of output and productivity across countries possible.
1948 · 78 years ago
The Marshall Plan tied US aid to European productivity targets
Reconstruction assistance came with productivity councils and study missions that spread American manufacturing and management methods across Western Europe, embedding output-per-worker measurement in postwar industrial policy.
1955 · 71 years ago
The Japan Productivity Center began Japan's postwar efficiency drive
Founded with US assistance, the centre imported statistical quality control and management methods that industry adapted into what became known as the Japanese productivity miracle, underpinning decades of manufacturing growth.
1956 · 70 years ago
Moses Abramovitz characterised total factor productivity as "a measure of our ignorance"
Abramovitz described total factor productivity as a residual left over after accounting for measured inputs, coining the phrase 'a measure of our ignorance'. The formulation framed TFP as capturing unexplained sources of growth rather than a directly observed quantity.
1957 · 69 years ago
Robert Solow defined 'technical change' as any shift in the production function
Solow's description became the most famous statement of what multi-factor productivity captures, treating technical change as shorthand for shifts in the production function. It underpinned the standard approach to measuring total factor productivity.
late 1960s–1970s · 66 years ago
Mainframe computers became widespread, displacing tabulating machines
Mainframe computing spread from the late 1960s through the 1970s, superseding tabulating machines in data processing. The shift altered how firms handled information-intensive production tasks.
1961 · 65 years ago
The Asian Productivity Organization was founded in Tokyo
Governments across Asia established an intergovernmental body to coordinate national productivity movements, exchange management methods and promote the systematic measurement of output per worker across member economies.
1966 · 60 years ago
The International Rice Research Institute released IR8, the seed of the Green Revolution
The high-yielding rice variety, developed in the Philippines and paired with new wheat strains from Mexico, multiplied cereal output per hectare across Asia and Latin America and reshaped agricultural productivity in the developing world.
late 1970s · 56 years ago
Industrial operations used inexpensive computers for process control and productivity tracking
By the late 1970s cheap computers allowed industrial plants to perform process control and to track productivity directly. This both raised efficiency and improved the measurement of it.
Recent Developments
Most recent firstAugust 2026 · this month
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported nonfarm business productivity up 1.4 per cent
Second-quarter 2026 data showed nonfarm business productivity rising 1.4 per cent and manufacturing productivity rising 1.9 per cent, continuing a run of output gains that outpaced growth in hours worked.
- The current business cycle sustained a 2.1 per cent annualised pace
July 2026 · last month
The Asian Development Bank forecast developing Southeast Asia to grow 4.7 per cent
The July 2026 Asian Development Outlook projected developing Southeast Asian economies expanding 4.7 per cent in 2026 and 4.8 per cent in 2027, with robust domestic demand doing more of the work than external trade.
July 2026 · last month
India and Japan agreed an industrial and critical minerals roadmap
The 16th India-Japan Annual Summit produced a joint statement expanding investment flows, semiconductor ecosystem cooperation and critical minerals security, aligned with India's Make in India programme and Japan's economic security strategy.
- The two prime ministers extended the roadmap into AI, energy and defence
May 2026 · 3 months ago
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics posted 2.9 per cent productivity growth for the first quarter
First-quarter 2026 nonfarm business labour productivity rose 2.9 per cent year on year as output increased 1.5 per cent and hours worked rose only 0.7 per cent, widening the gap between output and labour input.
April 2026 · 4 months ago
The World Bank warned job prospects were eroding in AI-exposed activities
The April 2026 South Asia Economic Update found job creation becoming harder across the region as automation reshaped AI-exposed occupations, even as India remained forecast to grow among the fastest major economies at 7.9 per cent.
2026 · this year
The OECD recorded the weakest productivity growth in decades
The 2026 Compendium of Productivity Indicators found GDP per hour worked rose 1.2 per cent on a weighted OECD average, but the median member country managed only 0.4 per cent, well below the 1.8 per cent median recorded in 2001–07.
2026 · this year
The OECD urged Japan to reignite productivity growth
The OECD's 2026 Economic Survey of Japan called for greater business dynamism, stronger innovation spillovers, more foreign capital and fuller use of digitalisation to lift an economy where productivity gains have lagged peers.
2026 · this year
China cut its 2026 growth target while pivoting to high-quality growth
Beijing set a 2026 GDP growth target of 4.5 to 5.0 per cent, presented as a deliberate shift away from growth at all costs toward productivity, technological upgrading and more balanced development.
- Independent forecasters saw the deceleration continuing into 2026
2025 · last year
India took the chair of the Asian Productivity Organization
India assumed the chairmanship of the Asian Productivity Organization for the 2025–26 term, committing to advance the APO's Vision 2030 and expand the Green Productivity 2.0 framework across member economies.
2024 · 2 years ago
The same compendium found employment growth driving most 2024 gains
Employment expansion rather than efficiency improvements accounted for GDP growth in 18 of 21 member countries in 2024, with multifactor productivity subtracting from growth in 14 of those economies, the OECD found.
2000s–2020s · 26 years ago
United States returned to a period of slow productivity growth
After the late-1990s acceleration, US productivity growth was again relatively slow from the 2000s into the 2020s. The renewed slowdown revived debate over the productivity paradox and the measurement of factor productivity.
late 1990s · 36 years ago
Computer, information and communications industries delivered much of the national productivity gains
In the late 1990s a large share of national productivity growth was concentrated in the computing, information and communications sectors. The pattern repeated an earlier dynamic in which gains cluster in leading industries.
1978 · 48 years ago
Deng Xiaoping's reforms unleashed three decades of efficiency-led growth in China
China's reform and opening-up programme dismantled central planning in stages, introduced market incentives in agriculture and industry, and redirected resources toward productivity rather than output quotas, transforming the country's growth trajectory.
1970s–early 1990s · 56 years ago
United States experienced relatively slow productivity growth despite computerisation
Overall US productivity growth was relatively slow from the 1970s through the early 1990s, a period coinciding with heavy investment in information technology. The gap between investment and measured gains became known as the productivity paradox.
A timeline taken from the English Wikipedia article “Productivity” (CC BY-SA 4.0), the only source the Atlas consulted for it.